-2021- Sheena Easton - The Definitive Singles 1... Here
However, the paper must note a structural weakness: the omission of B-sides and extended remixes. A truly “definitive” document of the single as a physical artifact would include the 12” mixes that defined club culture (e.g., the Shep Pettibone remix of The Lover in Me ). By focusing only on the 7”/radio edit, the compilation prioritizes the single as a radio commodity rather than a dance floor tool.
As the 1990s dawn, the compilation reflects the house music boom. The Lover in Me (1989) and What Comes Naturally (1991) are not merely dance tracks; they are demonstrations of Easton’s adaptability to the new production grammar of L.A. Reid and Babyface (for The Lover in Me ) and the industrial-tinged New Jack Swing of What Comes Naturally . -2021- Sheena Easton - The Definitive Singles 1...
From a scholarly perspective, these singles are vital for understanding gender politics in 1980s pop. Easton, previously marketed as a wholesome, doe-eyed everywoman (the cover of Take My Time ), was reconfigured by Prince as a figure of “violet velocity”—explicit, confident, and unapologetic. Sugar Walls , co-written by Prince under the pseudonym Alexander Nevermind, was infamously targeted by Tipper Gore’s Parents Music Resource Center (PMRC). The inclusion of this single in the compilation elevates it from a pop curio to a historical artifact of the censorship wars. The “Definitive” title here is earned by including the unedited, extended 12” mix, preserving the controversial lyricism that the radio edits neutered. However, the paper must note a structural weakness:
Crucially, this phase includes the James Bond theme For Your Eyes Only (1981). In the context of a singles compilation, this track is an anomaly that works brilliantly. It is not a “Sheena Easton” song in the club or working-class narrative sense; rather, it is a Bill Conti composition performed by Easton. Its inclusion demonstrates the power of the single as a placement vehicle. The polished orchestral pop of For Your Eyes Only sits uncomfortably next to the gritty synth of Machinery , yet the compilation forces the listener to acknowledge that Easton’s voice—a flexible, slightly nasal belt—was the unifying element. As the 1990s dawn, the compilation reflects the
The inclusion of a 2021 single—perhaps a new recording or a re-imagining of Modern Girl for the 40th anniversary—serves a metatextual purpose. It argues that Easton did not retire; rather, she transcended the charts. The "Definitive" collection asserts that a single’s value is not determined by its Billboard peak, but by its ability to represent the artist’s intent at that moment.
The Definitive Singles 1980–2021 (a hypothetical but structurally logical compilation, following the model of similar “definitive” box sets by artists like Pet Shop Boys or Erasure) serves as the ideal prism through which to examine Easton’s unique trajectory. Unlike a traditional “Greatest Hits” package, which prioritizes chart position, a “Definitive Singles” collection emphasizes chronology, sequencing, and the evolution of a single artist’s production aesthetic. This paper argues that Easton’s singles discography is not a disjointed series of stylistic lurches, but a coherent narrative of an artist who leveraged the single format to navigate shifting technological, commercial, and gendered expectations in the music industry.
The strength of this compilation concept lies in its rigorous adherence to . Unlike many compilations that reorder tracks for listening flow, a true definitive singles set risks listener whiplash (moving from the acoustic Almost Over You to the industrial thump of Days Like This ). This is its virtue. It refuses to smooth over the contradictions.
