Question for you: Will TBSE-X replace the main chain, or die in testnet? RT if you think it’s the future. Quote if you smell a rug. Option 3: Reddit r/CryptoCurrency Style (Skeptical/Degen)
I ran a node for 72 hours. Here are the raw metrics vs. the whitepaper claims. 🧵👇
Here is what I found looking under the hood:
The experimental "X" architecture introduces sharding. However, sharding a TBSE-based state root is risky. Cross-shard transactions currently rely on a centralized notary pool (Phase 1). This reintroduces trust assumptions that the original TBSE was designed to eliminate. tbse-x
📉 Verdict: TBSE-X is an experimental fork (the X stands for eXperimental, not 10x). Don't bridge mainnet assets to it yet.
Looking into TBSE-X: Why is nobody talking about the "Validator Gap"?
Has anyone else run a node on this? What latency are you seeing? Question for you: Will TBSE-X replace the main
Supposedly a Layer-1 fork that uses "Proof of History" mixed with TBSE's standard consensus. Basically, Solana meets TBSE.
Watch the v0.9.2 commit on GitHub. If they open the validator set to permissionless entry by Q3, this is a game changer. If not, "X" is just marketing.
Anyone else get whitelisted for the testnet? What's your uptime %? 🧵👇 Here is what I found looking under
I’ve been DCAing into TBSE for years, so when they announced , I was excited. But after digging through the explorer and the Discord, I found something weird.
🐛 The Bug: The consensus engine stalls when block height hits an odd number (Bug #TBSE-404). Devs patched it 6 hours ago, but the patch introduces a memory leak.
🚀 The Pitch: "Infinite scalability." The Reality: Max TPS topped at 4,200 before latency spiked. Good, but not "infinite."